Cases 21 - 30 of 216
LUGO-ROSARIO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2022cv04311
Plaintiff:
SOCORRO LUGO-ROSARIO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Rosario v. Jamison
as 3:2022cv01488
Petitioner:
Luis Rosario
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rosario v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
J. Cook, G. Ralston and J. Rivello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GEIGER et al v. La Cura, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02971
Plaintiff:
BROOKE JOHNSON, Rosie Wicks, Rhian Sugden and others
Defendant:
La Cura, Inc. doing business as Makumba Nightclub and Danny Concepcion
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Rosario v. Rivello et al
as 3:2021cv01840
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
J. Rivello, K. Kauffman, J. Spyker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv03599
Plaintiff:
HERMAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rivera v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv01269
Plaintiff:
Karim Rosario Rivera
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Rosario v. Spaulding
as 1:2021cv01160
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Petitioner:
Rene Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vazquez-Rosario v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00924
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Wal-Mart and others
Plaintiff:
Omayra Vazquez-Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSARIO et al v. BW Lehigh Associates, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv02902
Plaintiff:
JESSICA HINTON, CARISSA ROSARIO, JESSA HINTON and others
Defendant:
BEST WESTERN INTERNATIONAL, INC., James J. Dicara and BW Lehigh Associates, LLC doing business as The Bar With No Name
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
