Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. Reed et al
as 1:2017cv00934
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Defendant:
Rudolph L. Reed and Ruthie Lee Culver-Reed
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dixon v. USA
as 1:2017cv00377
Petitioner:
Woodrow Rudolph Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rudolph v. Williams et al
as 1:2016cv00667
Petitioner:
Rajkumar Rudolph
Respondent:
Stanley Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Global One Financial, Inc. v. VII Peaks Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00396
Plaintiff:
Global One Financial, Inc.
Defendant:
VII Peaks Capital, LLC, Gurprit S. Chandhoke and Rudolph A. Galera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wordlaw et al v. Flowers Foods, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00187
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Wordlaw
Defendant:
Flowers Foods, Inc. and Flowers Baking Company of Villa Rica, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Cooley v. Buford Board of Education et al
as 1:2015cv03009
Plaintiff:
James Rudolph Cooley
Defendant:
Buford Board of Education, The County of Gwinnett Georgia, City of Buford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
James Rudolph Cooley and Marisa Francesca Cooley
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC , Bank of America N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (MERS)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Orange v. United States Of America
as 5:2014cv00108
Petitioner:
Rudolph V. Orange
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ONEprop Georgia, LLC v. Grantum
as 1:2014cv03895
Plaintiff:
ONEprop Georgia, LLC
Defendant:
Rudolph Grantum
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LAGUNA et al v. HARRELSON et al
as 7:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
LOIDA LAGUNA , ANDRES R LAGUNA and MINOR CHILD
Defendant:
RUDOLPH HARRELSON and SOUTHERN TIRE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
