Cases 21 - 30 of 943
Easton v. Toliver et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Curtis D. Easton
Defendant:
T Oliver, John Doe, Toliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humble v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Derek Humble
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Robert Torres
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Scott Semple and Osborn Corrections Insitute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldrello v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00268
Defendant:
Brock Scott, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra V. Caldrello
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Young v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
William Young
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Martin, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Davis
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzurenda, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Maldenado et al
as 3:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Marcus Alvarado
Defendant:
Maldenado, Rich Hardy, Kevin Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Andres Carroll
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Carol Chapdelaine, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Ive Lee James
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
