Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 196
S. Mendel v. Liane Randolph, et al
as 21-15910
Defendant: ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Transportation, ANNE KRAMER, Attorney of the law firm Lichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., MICHAEL PICKER, in his individual and official capacity as President, Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant / Appellee: CLIFFORD RECHTSCHFFEN, in his indiviual and official capacity as Commissioner, California Public Utilities Commission, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MARITZA PEREZ, in her individual and official capacity as Section Supervisor Badge #11 Transportationb License Section California Public Utilities Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: S. PATRICK MENDEL
Watson v. USD 500, et al
as 21-3057
Defendant / Appellee: USD 500, KANSAS CITY, KANSAS
Defendant: ANITA ROCHA, Assistant Director of Transportation, LENORA MILLER, Executive Director of Operations, SANDY KIPER, Secretary of Transportation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARMEN NAOMI WATSON
State of Texas et al v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00065
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of Nebraska, State of Ohio and others
Defendant: United States Of America, Jennifer Granholm, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Energy, Scott De La Vega, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551
Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. Pipeline and Hazardous Materia, et al
as 21-1009
Respondent: Howard R. Elliott, in his official capacity as Administrator of Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Steven G. Bradbury, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Transportation, United States of America and others
Petitioner: Puyallup Tribe of Indians
State of Washington v. FMCSA, et al
as 20-73730
Respondent: FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, RAYMOND MARTINEZ, in his official capacity as Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Administrator and ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as Secretary of Transportation
Petitioner: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. PHMSA, et al
as 20-1431
Respondent: Howard R. Elliott, in his official capacity as Administrator of Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary of Transportation, United States of America and others
Petitioner: Puyallup Tribe of Indians
The Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. Pipeline & Hazardous Materials, et al
as 20-72472
Respondent: HOWARD R. ELLIOTT, in his official capacity as Administrator of Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as Secretary of Transportation, PIPELINE & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION and others
Petitioner: THE PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
R.L. Vallee, Inc. v. Vermont Agency of Transportati
as 20-2665
Defendant / Appellee: Joe Flynn, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Agency of Transportation, Vermont Agency of Transportation, an Agency of the State of Vermont other State of Vermont, Federal Highway Administration, an Agency of the United States Department of Transportation other United States Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff: Timberlake Associates, L.L.P. and WESCO, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: R.L. Vallee, Inc.
Aly Abdellatif, et al v. DHS, et al
as 20-1298
Respondent: United States Department of Homeland Security, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection and others
Petitioner: Z.N., Nina Araujo, Y.N., minor child and others
L.D. Management Company, et al v. Jim Gray We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5547
Plaintiff / Appellee: L.D. MANAGEMENT COMPANY and AMERICAN PRIDE IX, INC., dba Lion's Den, Adult Superstore
Defendant / Appellant: JIM GRAY, in his official capacity as Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?