Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Robertson v. LPS Services, Inc. d/b/a Reimagined Parking et al
as 0:2026cv03925
Plaintiff:
Melanie Robertson
Defendant:
LPS Services, Inc. d/b/a Reimagined Parking and Lanier Parking Services LLC d/b/a Reimagined Parking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Perttunen v. Dietsch et al
as 0:2026cv03804
Plaintiff:
Jordan John Perttunen
Defendant:
Samantha Renee Dietsch, Gaba Telepsychiatry, P.C., Dr. Gundu Anupama Reddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fairview Health Services v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
as 0:2026cv03810
Plaintiff:
Fairview Health Services
Defendant:
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Krueger v. Davis et al
as 0:2026cv03811
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Krueger
Defendant:
Warden L.S. Davis, FCI Waseca Health Services/Medical Department and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
