Cases 21 - 30 of 95
McDonnell v. Fhuere
as 3:2022cv00909
Defendant:
Michael Martin McDonnell
Respondent:
Superintendent Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Stay of Execution
Bonsignore v. Washburn
as 2:2022cv00820
Petitioner:
Jeremy James Bonsignore
Respondent:
Superintendent Susan Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mueller v. Ackley et al
as 3:2022cv00785
Plaintiff:
Christopher Charles Mueller
Defendant:
Superintendent DRCI Zack Ackley, Dr. Beamer and Ms. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erskine v. O.S.H. Superintendant et al
as 6:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Erskine
Defendant:
O.S.H. Superintendant, O.S.P. Superintendant, Michael Fagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Fhuere
as 6:2022cv00613
Petitioner:
Robert Willis
Respondent:
Superintendent Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Reyes
as 2:2022cv00011
Petitioner:
David D. Moore
Respondent:
Superintendent Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Snake River Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01540
Plaintiff:
Kyle Donovan Knight
Defendant:
Snake River Corrections, Dept of Corrections, Brad Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foust v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv01440
Plaintiff:
Jessica Anne Marie Foust and John Chapman
Defendant:
Kate Brown, Colette Peters, Garrett Laney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Brown et al
as 3:2021cv01321
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jerald Lee
Defendant:
Superintendent Nichole Brown, Blix, Lt. Balmesada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh v. Lynch et al
as 6:2021cv01124
Plaintiff:
Rotish Vikash Singh
Defendant:
Krysta Lynch, Oregon Department of Corrections, L. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
