Cases 21 - 30 of 2,052
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Adams v. Holler Law Firm et al
as 1:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Sherry Adams
Defendant:
Holler Law Firm, Najarian Capital, LLC, Scott K. Camp and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ward v. McConathy
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Scott Ward
Defendant:
Misty McConathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
DEMETRICE SCOTT
Defendant:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. New American Funding LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
Quandalyn Lucas
Defendant:
New American Funding LLC, Rick Arvielo doing business as CEO, McCalla Raymer Leiber Pierce LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28:l332 Diversity - Foreclosure
Campbell v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
MCGILLVARY v. HARTLEY et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
CALEB L MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
GREG HARTLEY, MARK BOWDEN, CHASE HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
