Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Davis v. John and Jane Does et al
as 4:2017cv00818
Plaintiff:
Patrick Davis
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Internal Security Officers John and Jane Does, Internal Intelligence Officers John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. GILL et al
as 2:2017cv00546
Plaintiff:
AARON VAUGHN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILL, S.C .I. GREENE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILL AND HIS CO-WORKERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL, JOSEPH GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEW v. ENNIS et al
as 1:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
PAUL ENNIS, OVERLANDER, IRELAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. MINSEC INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06267
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
MINSEC INC., SECURITY OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOES, FRANK GOSNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Percy Pew v. Jones et al
as 3:2015cv01611
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
E.A. Jones, Youch, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pew v. Huber et al
as 3:2015cv01407
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
Huber, Sneck, Digby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security Office of the Regional Chief Counsel
as 3:2015cv00509
Plaintiff:
Milagros Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Office of the Regional Chief Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LUCIANO-APONTE v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2013cv06486
Plaintiff:
BRYAN JESUS LUCIANO-APONTE
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DANIEL J. GEHLMANN, ALLEN G. JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAINES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv00782
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GAINES
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CLAIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
