Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Smith v. State of West Viginia
as 2:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
State of West Viginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02048
Plaintiff:
Brook K. Smith and Bradley Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27176
Plaintiff:
Alvis Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18925
Plaintiff:
Debra Diane Smith and Lorenzo Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv15418
Plaintiff:
Amanda Smith and Seth Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv13366
Plaintiff:
Bonnie C. Smith and David W. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13158
Plaintiff:
Brenda Smith and William Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09473
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Smith and Ronnie Burl Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09521
Plaintiff:
Stacy Smith and Ernest Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv04943
Plaintiff:
Evelyn R. Smith and Charles R. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
