Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Fletcher v. Mendonsa
as 12-1059
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS FLETCHER
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
Herbert v. Dickhaut
as 11-1888
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER HERBERT
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
Respondent:
LOIS A. RUSSO, former Superintendent of Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
White v. Dickhaut
as 11-1333
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD WHITE
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent, Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
Kilburn v. Dickhaut
as 11-1315
Petitioner:
ANDREW W. KILBURN
Respondent:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
Smith v. Dickhaut
as 11-1216
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR E SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
Hennessy v. Clarke, et al
as 10-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDMUND HENNESSY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOUZA-BARANOWSKI CORRECTIONAL CENTER, MCI-SHIRLEY MEDIUM and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN DENNEHY, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LOIS A. RUSSO and others
Alves v. Russo
as 10-1665
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE ALVES
Respondent - Appellee:
LOIS RUSSO, Superintendent, Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
Stroman v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2009cv11542
Plaintiff:
Evans E. Stroman
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pagan v. Dickhaut
as 08-2376
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS PAGAN
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
:
Hennessy v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv11724
Plaintiff:
Edmund Hennessy
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Kathleen Dennehy, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
