Cases 21 - 30 of 38
RODDY-SPIKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24535
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KAREN RODDY-SPIKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spikes v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2019cv14476
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Jimmy Spikes, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Liss v. Jacksonville Aviation Authority et al
as 3:2019cv00185
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, PHILIP SPIKES, DANIEL MCCRORY and others
Plaintiff:
FULTON P. LISS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPIKES v. BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00611
Plaintiff:
RHONDA SPIKES
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITFIELD v. LANGLEY
as 4:2016cv00784
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WHITFIELD
Defendant:
R LANGLEY , J SANTO , MIKEL ANNE CORBEETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPIKES v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2016cv00322
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SPIKES
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Spikes v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv22311
Plaintiff:
David Spikes
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JAMES v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
RAY JAMES
Defendant:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C SMITH, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain et al v. Lee
as 6:2013cv01589
Plaintiff:
Elaine McClain and David McClain
Defendant:
Shelton J. (Spike) Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BUTLER v. TUCKER
as 4:2012cv00405
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE BUTLER, JR
Defendant:
KENNETH S TUCKER, MILTON HICKS, R MCCAMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
