Cases 21 - 30 of 68
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
WARDEN SECRETARY TENAKA BROWN, LISA FOUNTAIN, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKEN v. PHILPIN et al
as 5:2019cv00054
Defendant:
MARK TAYLOR, LIEUTENANT LESTER, ANGELA GLOVER and others
Plaintiff:
JAY JUNIOR AIKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. BOWEN, et al
as 5:2018cv00428
Plaintiff:
JON ROBERT OLIVER
Defendant:
WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN, SGT GREEN, FOSKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv04905
Defendant:
Counselor Cripp, Renfroe, Dr. Decruise and others
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. BERRY et al
as 5:2018cv00331
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN THOMAS, WARDEN BERRY, UNIT MANAGER KANE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spikes v. Delta Family-Care Disability And Survivorship Plan, Delta Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2018cv04126
Defendant:
Delta Family-Care Disability and Survivorship Plan, Delta Airlines, Inc., Delta Family-Care Disability And Survivorship Plan and Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Giovanni Spikes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Gould v. Perry, et al
as 1:2018cv03606
Plaintiff:
Arthur Gould
Defendant:
Unknown, Juanita Thorpe, Nwabeze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2018cv00245
Defendant:
CHIEF COUNSELOR STREETER, BRUCE CHATMAN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR SHARON LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POWELL v. BERRY et al
as 5:2018cv00234
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN THOMAS, UNIT MANAGER KANE, WARDEN BERRY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley Abramson v. Equifax Inc.
as 1:2018cv01466
Plaintiff:
Ashley Abramson, Kimberly Dawn Alvarez , Edwin Jeffrey Amador and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
