Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Mark Lombardi v. Stan Czerniak
as 10-35263
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK LOMBARDI
Respondent - Appellee:
STAN CZERNIAK
Williams v. Hall
as 6:2001cv00812
Respondent:
Stan Czerniak and Guy Hall
Petitioner:
Shawn Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Potter v. Williams et al
as 1:2009cv06280
Plaintiff:
Jacques Stewart Potter
Defendant:
Max Williams, Tom O'Conner, Ginger Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert King, Jr. v. Joe Capps, et al
as 09-35304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HADEN KING, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE E. CAPPS, Inspector III, RON MYERS, Hearings Officer, WADE SCROGHAM, Hearings Administrator and others
Lombardi v. Czerniak
as 6:2009cv06008
Petitioner:
Mark Lombardi
Respondent:
Stan Czerniak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casey Johnson v. USDC-ORP
as 08-74198
:
In re: CASEY LEE JOHNSON
Petitioner:
CASEY LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Real Party In Interest:
MAX WILLIAMS, STAN CZERNIAK, BRIAN BELLEQUE and others
Rotish Singh v. V. Clark, et al
as 08-35652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROTISH VIKASH SINGH
Defendant - Appellee:
V. CLARK, T. HICKS, DR. STOUNE and others
King v. Capps et al
as 6:2008cv06195
Plaintiff:
Robert Haden King, Jr
Defendant:
Joe E. Capps, Ron Myers, Wade Scrogham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Czerniak et al
as 1:2008cv00019
Defendant:
Stan Czerniak, Brian Belleque, A. Bales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singh v. Czerniak et al
as 3:2007cv01906
Plaintiff:
Rotish V. Singh
Defendant:
Stan Czerniak, M. Buchholz, Tom Cramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
