Cases 21 - 30 of 168
Gumbs v. Stanford
as 1:2022cv04659
Petitioner:
Secunda Gumbs
Respondent:
Ms. Tina M. Stanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albritton v. Fredella et al
as 1:2022cv04512
Plaintiff:
Jemal Albritton
Defendant:
Lawrence Fredella, Tina M. Stanford, Tyece Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Kemp et. al
as 1:2022cv02401
Plaintiff:
Adonis Gonzalez
Defendant:
Astra Space Inc., Chris C. Kemp, Kelyn Brannon and others
Fernandez v. Stanford
as 1:2022cv02498
Petitioner:
Mr. Salvador Fernandez and Salvador Fernandez
Respondent:
Ms. Tina M. Stanford, Tina M. Stanford and Mckenzie Trubridge
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ms. Mckenzie Trubridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01122
Plaintiff:
John Curry
Defendant:
State Of New York, Rodney Young, Ms. Charvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Annucci et al
as 6:2022cv06030
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Nelson
Defendant:
Anthony J Annucci, Richard De Simone, Margaret Wolcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Nelson
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Richard De Simone, Margaret Wolcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Miller et al
as 2:2021cv05339
Petitioner:
Daniel Miller
Respondent:
Mark Miller and Tina M. Stanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miller v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv07774
Petitioner:
Daniel Miller
Respondent:
Mark Miller and Tina M. Stanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Tripathy v. Feuz et al
as 7:2021cv05349
Plaintiff:
Sanjay Tripathy
Defendant:
J. Feid, New York State Board of Parole, John Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
