Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Paterson v. Nevada, State Of et al
as 3:2011cv00755
Defendant:
Officer Columbus, C/O Dunham, Sr. C/O Henley and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Paterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hewitt v. Perry et al
as 3:2011cv00700
Defendant:
Shane Dennis, Adam Luis, John Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Tony G. Hewitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hewitt v. Peery et al
as 3:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
Tony C. Hewitt
Defendant:
Adam Luis, Nevada, State Of, John Peery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reo Boren v. Bocca, et al
as 11-16070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REO BOREN
Defendant - Appellee:
BOCCA, Warden, 1st amended complaint, WATSON, Warden, 1st amended complaint, GRAFRON, Case Worker, 1st amended complaint and others
Reo Boren v. Bocca, et al
as 11-15990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REO BOREN
Defendant - Appellee:
BOCCA, Warden, 1st amended complaint, WATSON, Warden, 1st amended complaint, GRAFRON, Case Worker, 1st amended complaint and others
Jane Doe v. County of Luzerne, et al
as 10-3921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LUZERNE, RYAN FOY, in his Individual Capacity and BARRY STANKUS, in his Individual Capacity
Lewis v. Stankus et al
as 3:2010cv00497
Defendant:
P. Lessard, A. Luis and A. Stankus
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman Sallitt, Jr. v. Barry Stankus, et al
as 10-2908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN SALLITT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRY STANKUS, COUNTY OF LUZERNE and GEORGE KAMAGE, JR.
Smith v. Sholties et al
as 3:2009cv00558
Plaintiff:
Alan B. Smith
Defendant:
Randall Sholties, Adolph Stankus, James Minnix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-15348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
