Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
U.S. Department of Labor v. Serenity Home Healthcare LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00803
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
Serenity Home Healthcare LLC, Serenity Home Healthcare - Norfolk LLC, Serenity Home Healthcare - Warrenton LLC and others
Flick v. Sterling
as 3:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Paul Flick
Defendant:
Robert Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ward v. Clarke
as 1:2022cv00381
Petitioner:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell Sterling Ward
Respondent:
Director Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Clarke
as 7:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell Sterling Ward
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Clark
as 1:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell Sterling Ward
Respondent:
Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ward v. Clark
as 7:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Norel Sterling Ward and Norell Sterling Ward
Respondent:
Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walsh v. Plaza Azteca Great Neck, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00531
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor Martin J. Walsh and Martin J. Walsh,
Defendant:
Plaza Azteca Great Neck, Inc., Plaza Azteca Jefferson, Inc., Plaza Azteca Suffolk, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
UNITED STATES v. First Baptist Church of Sterling
as 1:2021cv00051
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
First Baptist Church of Sterling
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
