Cases 21 - 30 of 108
CHAPMAN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, WOOD FOREST NATIONAL BANK, AMBER O ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Communications Workers of America v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Communications Workers of America
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Smith v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Justice Smith
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PG Wireless, Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00593
Plaintiff:
PG Wireless, Inc.
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. doing business as T-Mobile and Sprint Solutions, Inc. doing business as T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Phelps v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2020cv04102
Defendant:
Deutsche Telekom doing business as T-Mobile USA Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ellis Eugene Phelps
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perry v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2021cv04314
Plaintiff:
Tito Perry
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Toler v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03144
Plaintiff:
Charles Andrew Toler
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC and Doe Defendants 1-20
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
