Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Smith et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21639
Plaintiff:
Benjamin T Smith and Jerine Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Smith, Jr. et al
as 2:2012cv00559
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Donald T. Smith, Jr. and Strike City, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Berman v. Liu et al
as 2:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Larry Berman
Defendant:
Paul Liu, F. William Sapp, Honorable Richard S. Sheward and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith v. DePuy International Limited et al
as 1:2011dp22355
Plaintiff:
Mary T. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22113
Plaintiff:
Leslie T Smith and Carol Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blume v. Supilanas et al
as 2:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Blume
Defendant:
Mary Jean Supilanas, John W. Nau, Landon T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. General Electric Company
as 1:2009gd50211
Plaintiff:
Susan T. Smith
Defendant:
General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Weigand et al
as 1:2009cv01386
Plaintiff:
Edward L Williams
Defendant:
Michael Weigand, David Fish, Ninth District Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wilson
as 1:2008cv00845
Petitioner:
Stanley T. Smith
Respondent:
Julius Wilson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Doe I et al v. Dann et al
as 1:2008cv00220
Plaintiff:
John Doe I, John Doe I, John Doe I and others
Defendant:
Marc Dann, Kermit Howard, Dan Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
