Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tate v. USA
as 0:2011cv03337
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv01702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
American Dairy Queen Corporation v. James Tate Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv04756
Plaintiff:
American Dairy Queen Corporation
Defendant:
James Tate Enterprises, Inc. and James Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv03387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bowman v. Wyeth, LLC et al
as 0:2010cv01946
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tate Bowman
Defendant:
Wyeth, LLC, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tate v. Davol, Inc. et alDO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv00602
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Tate and Billy Joe Tate
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Yang v. City of Shakopee, The et al
as 0:2009cv03216
Plaintiff:
Neng Por Yang
Defendant:
City of Shakopee, The, Shakopee Police Dept., The, John Buetow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Tate et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv02666
Plaintiff:
Willie B. Tate, Willie B. Tate, Robbie J. Tate and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv02521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
