Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Tatum v. SLCRC et al
as 4:2012cv00879
Plaintiff:
Timothy T. Tatum
Defendant:
SLCRC, St. Mary's Honor Center, Norvella Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum v. Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Correctional Center et al
as 4:2012cv00810
Plaintiff:
Timothy T. Tatum
Defendant:
Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Correctional Center, Brian Murphy and Unknown Shumway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum v. Justice Center
as 4:2012cv00779
Plaintiff:
Timothy T. Tatum
Defendant:
Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson Equipment Co., Inc. v. Tatum Press Services, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv05026
Plaintiff:
Robertson Equipment Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Tatum Press Services, LLC and Tatum Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hiltibran et al v. Levy et al
as 2:2010cv04185
Defendant:
Ronald J Levy and Ian McCaslin
Plaintiff:
Steven Hiltibran , Nicholas Tatum , Ronald Coontz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Simmons et al v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00625
Plaintiff:
Kandice Simmons, Tamika Kilgore, Meia Burks and others
Defendant:
Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and EAN Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tatum v. Denny et al
as 4:2009cv00487
Petitioner:
Vernon Tatum
Respondent:
Larry Denny, Missouri Board of Probation and Parole and Chris Koster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
