Cases 21 - 30 of 275
Golden Bridge R2 LLC v. BD781 LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05264
Plaintiff:
Golden Bridge R2 LLC
Defendant:
BD781 LLC, YAG781 Corp., Joseph Rubin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Syquia et al
as 1:2023cv04776
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gloria T. Syquia, New York City Department of Finance and New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
W Financial REIT, Ltd v. 150-152 East 79 LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03942
Plaintiff:
W FINANCIAL REIT, LTD
Defendant:
150-152 EAST 79 LLC, ZIEL FELDMAN, LANGAN ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, SURVEYING, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & GEOLOGY, D.P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
The Secretary of The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. The Estate of Lillian Carmody aka Lillian M. Carmody, deceased et al
as 1:2023cv02297
Plaintiff:
THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, an agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and The Secretary of The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant:
The Estate of Lillian Carmody aka Lillian M. Carmody, deceased, Robert Golambos and Betsy Froehling, Trustees of the Irrevocable Trust Agreement of Lillian M. Carmody, under an agreement dated October 18, 2011, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1703 Default of HUD Loan
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Dolores Sartori, deceased et al
as 1:2022cv07925
Plaintiff:
THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, an agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant:
Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Dolores Sartori, deceased, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, New York City Environmental Control Board; and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1703 Default of HUD Loan
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Kings County Public Administrator et al
as 1:2022cv07052
Plaintiff:
THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, an agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant:
Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Dolores Sartori, deceased, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, United States of America o/b/o Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
U.S. Bank National Association v. Whittle et al
as 2:2022cv05484
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
H. Christopher Whittle, 100 Briar Patch, LLC, Golden Eagle International Trading Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Tyler Technologies, Inc. v. New York State Department of Taxation and Finance et al
as 1:2022cv00877
Plaintiff:
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and New York State Office of Information Technology Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Millennium Trust Company, LLC v. Bettencourt et al
as 2:2022cv04016
Defendant:
Denise Carey Bettencourt, Millicent Z. Carey, Denise Bettencourt and others
Plaintiff:
Millenium Trust Company, LLC as Custodian FBO Prime Meridian NPL, LLC and Millennium Trust Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Greene v. New York State Department of Taxation and Finance et al
as 1:2022cv05261
Plaintiff:
James A. Greene
Defendant:
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and Capital One Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
