Cases 21 - 30 of 309
Marler v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00240
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Marler
Respondent:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Marler v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Marler
Respondent:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Marler v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Marler
Defendant:
Estella Derr, Dr. Kwon and Nurse Dayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marler v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marler
Defendant:
Estella Derr, Dr. Pysh, Ms. L. Lazo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Palekaiko Beachboys Club, Inc. et al v. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2021cv00500
Plaintiff:
Palekaiko Beachboys Club, Inc. and Thomas John Copp
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shimizu v. Takamura et al
as 1:2021cv00498
Plaintiff:
Rika Shimizu
Defendant:
Mina Takamura, Rikuta Takamura, Takeshi Nambu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malori v. Goo et al
as 1:2021cv00481
Plaintiff:
Roberta Malori
Defendant:
Nelson W. Goo, Circuit Court, Thomas Waters and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. The Association of Apartment Owners of Waikiki Landmark
as 1:2021cv00438
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Ryan
Defendant:
The Association of Apartment Owners of Waikiki Landmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
