Cases 21 - 30 of 84
SMITH v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY VOTERS REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv01636
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY VOTERS REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SMITH v. ADMINISTRACTIVE SERVER ELECTION DIVISION
as 2:2016cv01592
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ADMINISTRACTIVE SERVER ELECTION DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SHUMAN CENTERS et al
as 2:2016cv01593
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
SHUMAN CENTERS and JUVINALL COURT DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BEARD et al
as 2:2016cv01543
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERY A. BEARD, BILL ROBISON, FREDRIC WALDROES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. THE GREEN SHEET OWNERS
as 2:2016cv01544
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
THE GREEN SHEET OWNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WARDEN OR SUPTENTDENT et al
as 2:2016cv01504
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN OR SUPTENTDENT and CLEVELAND OHIO COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY
as 2:2016cv01498
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY WARDEN et al
as 2:2016cv01487
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY WARDEN and CHIEF PSYCHIATRIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BUFFALO STATE HOSPITAL
as 2:2016cv01499
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
BUFFALO STATE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. PENNSYLVANIA BRUEAU OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01497
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BRUEAU OF CORRECTIONS, CHIEF SECEATARY JEFFERY H. BEARD and WILLIAM ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
