Cases 21 - 30 of 228
Price v. Berryman et al
as 5:2023cv03056
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
Robert Berryman and C. Chaffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ohlde v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
as 5:2023cv04015
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ohlde
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Price v. Labahn et al
as 5:2023cv03046
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
R. Labahn, Nicole Middleton and K. Zeller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. McBratney-Spradlin et al
as 5:2023cv03045
Defendant:
Caleb Nesmith, KiAnn Caprice McBratney-Spradlin and Kaleb Nesmith
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Burch
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Price v. Armbrister et al
as 5:2022cv03271
Petitioner:
John Timothy Price
Respondent:
J. Armbrister and Lawrence Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Hill
as 5:2022cv03268
Petitioner:
John Timothy Price
Respondent:
Brian C. Hall and Brian C. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2022cv03260
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Chad McBride, J. Armbrister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2022cv03259
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, J. Armbrister and Brian C. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
