Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Lockett v. Toney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00209
Plaintiff: Terence Linwood Lockett, Sr.
Defendant: Earnest Toney, Wesley Reed and James Ennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickler v. Toney et al
as 2:2013cv00058
Plaintiff: Robert Dale Strickler
Defendant: Ernest L. Toney, Doctor Gordon and Piedmont Regional Jail Authority, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosner v. Dodt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01366
Plaintiff: Ronald L. Cosner
Defendant: B. Dodt and Ronald Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Sgt Judah et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00550
Plaintiff: Gabriel Mitchell
Defendant: Sgt Judah, Deputy Freeman and Deputy Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Toney
as 3:2012cv00359
Petitioner: Jermaine Keith Walker
Respondent: Ernest Toney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00199
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00164
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv00555
Petitioner: Anthony Eugene Brooks
Respondent: United States of America, Federal Parole, Federal or State Probation until 2014 and Ernest Toney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brooks v. Toney et al
as 2:2011cv00486
Plaintiff: Anthony Eugene Brooks
Defendant: Ernest Toney, Mrs. Moss and Contracted Owners of Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00898
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?