Cases 21 - 30 of 35
BRYANT v. TRAENDLY et al
as 3:2019cv04758
Defendant:
TANIA LARKIN, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and MICHAEL TRAENDLY
Plaintiff:
PIERCE BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALICEA et al v. CITY OF CAMDEN
as 1:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN ALICEA , RUBIN ALICEA, JR. , WILLIAM F. ARMSTRONG and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RODRIGUEZ v. THE DEPARTMENT OF POLICE (TRENTON, NJ) et al
as 3:2017cv12902
Plaintiff:
LUZ RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
THE DEPARTMENT OF POLICE (TRENTON, NJ), THE DEPARTMENT OF SECURITY GUARD AT AMTRAK, AUTTRA POLICE GUARD IN TRENTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHISON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv09446
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Plaintiff:
TANIA HUTCHISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BELLO v. VON PIER et al
as 2:2017cv04622
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BELLO
Defendant:
LISA VON PIER, ALLISON BLAKE, TANIA PENA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ACTEON, INC. v. MARTIN
as 1:2016cv04399
Plaintiff:
ACTEON, INC.
Defendant:
TANIA MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FENWICK v. DUKHMAN et al
as 2:2013cv04359
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA FENWICK
Defendant:
EDDIE DUKHMAN, TANIA PATRUNO, HELEN KHOROSH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
PAULSBORO DERAILMENT CASES
as 1:2013cv00784
Plaintiff:
DONALD WILSON , MISHON WILSON , ALVERA BLANDING ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
