Cases 21 - 30 of 97
David Jamerson v. Kristopher Taskila, et al
as 22-1708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE JAMERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTOPHER TASKILA, Warden, NATHAN HOFFMAN, Assistant Deputy Warden, LANCE MILLER, Resident Unit Manager and others
Jones v. Taskila
as 2:2022cv11824
Petitioner:
Drakile Leroy Jones
Respondent:
Kristopher Taskila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Jamerson v. Kristopher Taskila, et al
as 22-1599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LEE JAMERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTOPHER TASKILA, Warden, NATHAN HOFFMAN, Assistant Deputy Warden, LANCE MILLER, Resident Unit Manager and others
Jamerson #138940 v. Taskila et al
as 2:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
David L. Jamerson #138940
Defendant:
Kristopher Taskila, Nate Hoffman, Lance Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins #578540 v. Taskila
as 1:2022cv00427
Petitioner:
Benjamin Roy Wilkins #578540
Respondent:
Kristopher Taskila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins #578540 v. Taskila
as 2:2022cv00091
Petitioner:
Benjamin Ray Wilkins #578540
Respondent:
Kristopher Taskila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Adams v. Kristopher Taskila
as 22-1284
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES R. ADAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
KRISTOPHER TASKILA, Warden
Wilson #258602 v. Homer et al
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Edmund Wilson #258602
Defendant:
Unknown Homer, K. Taskila, Unknown Petterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Adams v. Kristopher Taskila
as 22-1244
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES R. ADAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
KRISTOPHER TASKILA, Warden
James Adams v. Kristopher Taskila
as 22-1223
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES R. ADAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
KRISTOPHER TASKILA, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
