Cases 21 - 30 of 52
LAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31432
Plaintiff:
TAI TAN LAM
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 0:2020cv61122
Plaintiff:
Louis Vuitton Malletier
Defendant:
The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", life_stores, brono2019 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
SUBIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv96351
Plaintiff:
TAI ANTONIA SUBIA
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92743
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TAI HOO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COCHRAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08289
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TAY COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glimcher v. Shin et al
as 0:2020cv60063
Defendant:
LPS Florida Holdings, LLC, Ronald M LaSorsa, Amy M Voight and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Glimcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Baerga v. Orange County, Florida et al
as 6:2019cv02409
Defendant:
Orange County, Florida, Feki Tai, John Mina and others
Plaintiff:
Loushar Baerga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv24924
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv24927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
HO v. COSTELLO et al
as 5:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
DUONG T HO
Defendant:
DEDEE S COSTELLO, ELIJAH SMILEY, JENNIFER ALANE HAWKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
