Cases 21 - 30 of 41
De Cambra v. Sakai
as 1:2014cv00122
Petitioner:
John De Cambra
Respondent:
Ted Sakai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gregg v. State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety
as 1:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Gregg
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Ted Sakai and Neal Wagatsuma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Grandinetti v. Sakai et al
as 1:2014cv00060
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Ted Sakai, Max Otani, Shari Kimoto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Sakai et al
as 1:2013cv00514
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Defendant:
Ted Sakai, Martha Torney, Max Otani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tia v. City of Aiea Board of Water Supply et al
as 1:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
City of Aiea Board of Water Supply, Meadow Gold Dairies Inc., Kaiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Victory Ohana Does et al
as 1:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Victory Ohana Does, Lyle Antonio, HCF MISHU Floorboy DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilchrist v. Kimoto et al
as 1:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
Brandalynne Gilchrist
Defendant:
Shari Kimoto, Heather Kimura, Joe Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Sakai et al
as 1:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Zack Morris
Defendant:
Ted Sakai, Wes Munn, Jennifer Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wideman v. Abercrombie et al
as 1:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Reginald Wideman
Defendant:
Neil Abercrombie, Ted Sakai, Phyllis Hironaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grindling v. Sakai
as 1:2013cv00057
Petitioner:
Chris Grindling
Respondent:
Ted Sakai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
