Cases 21 - 30 of 9,451
Nathaniel Brazill v. Jonathan Jones, et al
as 24-13359
Defendant:
JONATHAN C. JONES, CHRISTOPHER BRANNON and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL R. BRAZILL
German, Daryl v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv24881
Defendant:
Aramak Corrections Services, Florida Department of Corrections and Chaney Brothers
Plaintiff:
Daryl Lenard German
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson, John v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv24815
Plaintiff:
John J. Wilson, Jr
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sylvia Hudgins-Verellen v. State of Florida, Department of Corrections
as 24-14018
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA HOPE HUDGINS-VERELLEN
Carlester Fryson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-13528
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
CARLESTER V. FRYSON
Ruben Arroyo v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-13347
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
RUBEN ARROYO
Rhone v. Florida Highway Patrol - Troop G et al
as 3:2024cv01274
Defendant:
Allied Universal Security Services, Florida Department of Corrections Probation Office, Florida Highway Patrol - Troop G and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rhone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antonio Knight v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13370
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ANTONIO WADE KNIGHT
Robert Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-14024
Petitioner:
ROBERT JAMES DAVIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Arthur Wright v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-13297
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR N. WRIGHT
Defendant:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
