Cases 21 - 30 of 234
Patterson v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02842
Plaintiff:
John T. Patterson
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patterson v. May
as 3:2022cv01116
Petitioner:
Cornelius Patterson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guillard et al v. Pyle et al
as 2:2022cv01960
Plaintiff:
Gezelle Guillard, John Peterson and Toshalyn Murray
Defendant:
Tom Pyle, Justin Elekes, Kayla Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miller v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Todd Miller
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Mike DeWine, State or Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon et al v. TSK Express, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Frankie Dixon, Monique Pridgen, Ernesto Yaque and others
Defendant:
TSK Express, LLC, NJ Expedite, LLC and Nemanja Jerkovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Patterson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05723
Plaintiff:
Matthew Patterson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson, Jr. v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv02210
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Patterson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Beth Oehler, Thomas King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
St. John v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority et al
as 1:2021cv02198
Plaintiff:
Lars St. John
Defendant:
Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Jeffery K. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05067
Plaintiff:
Patrick Patterson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
