Cases 21 - 30 of 1,326
SANCHEZ LEVYA v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06028
Petitioner:
GERARDO ANTONIO SANCHEZ LEVYA
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05860
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
FEAGIN v. LAWSON et al
as 2:2024cv05835
Plaintiff:
EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Defendant:
MR. LAWSON, JEANETTE MATOS and MR. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALVAREZ PEREZ v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05715
Petitioner:
JUAN ALVAREZ PEREZ
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ v. RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv05635
Petitioner:
EFRAIN VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WICK v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05632
Petitioner:
KEVIN J. WICK
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SARRO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05577
Petitioner:
BRIAN SARRO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAGLIAFERRO v. RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv05414
Petitioner:
SALVATORE TAGLIAFERRO
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SAMUELS v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05416
Petitioner:
MILTON SAMUELS
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
