Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Thompson v. Erwin Pearl, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00395
Plaintiff:
William Thompson
Defendant:
Erwin Pearl, Inc., Armbrust International, Ltd, F.O. Inc. (Fernando Originals) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thompson v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2013cv00475
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Thompson
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Thompson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
Janice I. Thompson
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Aurora Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Palermo v. Wall
as 1:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Palermo
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Officer Olson, Officer Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03499
Plaintiff:
Carole L. Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00469
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jerry D Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thompson v. USA
as 1:2009cv00184
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gregory M Thompson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Textron Financial Corporation v. Thompson
as 1:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
Textron Financial Corporation, Textron Financial Corporation and Textron Financial Corporation
Defendant:
T. L. Thompson
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Roccon Thompson v. UBS Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
Lorene Roccon Thompson and Lorene Roccon Thompson
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services, Inc. and Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
