Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Emmanuel Grant v. Village of Fox Lake et al
as 1:2018cv04517
Petitioner:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
Village of Fox Lake, John Doe U.S. Marshalls, John Doe Deputy Sheriffs and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. U.S. Marshal's Service Agency et al
as 3:2017cv01288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Holloway, III
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal's Service Agency and John Doe #1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. U.S. Marshal's Service Agency et al
as 1:2017cv01531
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Holloway, III
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal's Service Agency and John Doe #1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon v. U.S. Marshal's Service et al
as 1:2017cv07292
Plaintiff:
Cauirece Herndon
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal's Service and Ken Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donelson v. US Dist. Court et al
as 1:2017cv06336
Petitioner:
Joseph Donelson
Respondent:
US Dist. Court , U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. U.S. Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv05941
Plaintiff:
Albert Louis Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Justice , U.S. Parole Commission , Randell Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montague v. Hargett et al
as 1:2017cv01209
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Montague
Defendant:
Robert Hargett, All Shriner's of America, U.S. Army and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheurich v. U.S. Marshalls
as 3:2016cv00876
Plaintiff:
David Scheurich
Defendant:
U.S. Marshalls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bell v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv05858
Petitioner:
Melvin T. Bell
Respondent:
United States, United States Attorney Office and U.S. Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Summit Police Dept. et al
as 1:2016cv04640
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Summit Police Dept., U.S. Marshalls , D.E.A. Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
