Cases 21 - 30 of 120
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Sohail Rice Mills USA, Inc. et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
as 1:2020cv06208
Defendant:
Director of USCIS Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and Acting Secretary DHS Chad Wolf
Plaintiff:
Zubair Chaudhry and Sohail Rice Mills USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Sidorova v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv06081
Defendant:
Director of USCIS Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Acting Secretary DHS Chad Wolf, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Alena Sidorova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pustynnova v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv06084
Defendant:
Director of USCIS Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Acting Secretary DHS Chad Wolf, Lee Bowes and others
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Pustynnova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10420
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05970
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05937
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
