Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03786
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HAMPTON v. PROTECTION PLUS SECURITY CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv06982
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HAMPTON
Defendant:
PROTECTION PLUS SECURITY CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES, UNIVERSAL SERVICES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Anaeme v. USA et al
as 2:2014cv00281
Defendant:
Universal Services of America, Lawrence E. Delbridge, State of New Mexico and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maria Corral v. Sky Sports Inc et al
as 2:2013cv06892
Plaintiff:
Maria Corral
Defendant:
Keith Leedom, Sky Sports Inc and Universal Services of America, Inc.
Collins v. San Diego Metropolitan Transit System et al
as 3:2013cv00960
Plaintiff:
Victor Collins
Defendant:
San Diego Metropolitan Transit System, Officer D. Belvis, Officer F. Moya and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co Ltd v. Universal Services of America Inc et al
as 8:2012cv01423
Plaintiff:
Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co Ltd
Defendant:
Universal Protection Service Inc and Universal Services of America Inc
Rural Cellular Association v. FCC
as 11-1094
Petitioner:
Rural Cellular Association and Universal Service for America Coalition
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission
Universal Services of America, Inc. v. Steiner Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04271
Defendant:
Steiner Company, Inc., Alsco, Inc. and Penco Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Universal Services of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
STEINER COMPANY, INC
as 1:2009cv03853
Plaintiff:
STEINER COMPANY, INC
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Replevin & Conversion
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
