Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Jones v. Quigley et al
as 4:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Jones
Defendant:
Paul Quigley, Douglas Debruin, Teneil Cangas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hamby
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Jerry Bartruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00219
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan and Cassandra Zent
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Sheryl Dahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan and Gary L Buck
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Dorothy Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan et al v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00186
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Statewide Religion Review Committee, Dorothy Faust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan v. Phillips et al
as 4:2014cv00358
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan
Defendant:
Cynthia Phillips, Nick Ludwick, Rebecca Bowker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bitzan v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Mark Bitzan
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Iowa Department of Corrections, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby et al v. Schierbrock
as 4:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hamby, Gary L Buck and Mark Bitzan
Defendant:
Mike Schierbrock, Julie Johnson, Rebecca Bowker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
Charles D Watkins
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Michael Savala, Sheryl Lockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Ault et al
as 4:2011cv00604
Plaintiff:
Delores Thompson
Defendant:
Jerry Burt, Sheryl Lockwood, Michael Savala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
