Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Vidal Bueno Vazquez
as 0:2009cr00298
Defendant: Vidal Bueno Vazquez
Plaintiff: USA and USA
Castro-Vazquez
as 0:2009mc00065
Petitioner: Aeropajito Castro-Vazquez
Vazquez v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2009cv01425
Plaintiff: Ronald Vazquez and Ronald Vazquez
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Vazquez-Riviera v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2009cv00468
Plaintiff: Genoveva Vazquez-Rivera and Genoveva Vazquez-Rivera
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Castro-Vazquez v. Minnesota, State of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv00276
Petitioner: Aeropajito Castro-Vazquez
Respondent: Minnesota, State of, Minnesota, State of and Minnesota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrasquel-Rivera et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2008cv06010
Plaintiff: Emilio Alejandro Carrasquel-Rivera, Lillian Vazquez-Rivera, Conjugal Partnership Carrasquel-Vazquez and others
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2008cv04903
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Vazquez v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv03804
Plaintiff: Gloria Esther Otero Vazquez
Defendant: Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?