Cases 21 - 30 of 938
KEYS, JR. v. HARDY et al
as 8:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
OWEN M KEYS, JR.
Defendant:
MELANIE HARDY and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
JACKSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
MELVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Duarte v. Vitorino et al
as 8:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Luisa Duarte
Defendant:
Vincenzo Vitorino and Billy Douglas Hogue, Jr.
Cross Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and CURTIS CRISTE
SWEENEY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SWEENEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BAYLOR v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
TAMIKA BAYLOR
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
HENDERSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
KATHY HENDERSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER
Davis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
LEONARD A DAVIS and Leonard A. Davis
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
DAWKINS v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
RAKIM DAWKINS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
