Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Chase v. Walker et al
as 1:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Parrish Chase
Defendant:
Kenneth Walker, Victoria Almeida, Nancy Garcia-Ponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of RI et al
as 1:2011cv00637
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Brown
Defendant:
State of RI, Lincoln Chafee, AT Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Ashbel et al
as 1:2011cv00599
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Moore
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, II, Robert M. McCutcheon, Kenneth R. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. Chafee et al
as 1:2011cv00586
Plaintiff:
Parrish Chase
Defendant:
Lincoln Chafee, David Fathi, Alvin J. Bronstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonneau et al v. Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 51 Pension Trust et al
as 1:2011cv00512
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Bonneau , Richard Donelly , James Koziera and others
Defendant:
Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 51 Pension Trust , Robert Bolton , David Rampone and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Moore v. Wall et al
as 1:2011cv00483
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L. Moore
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, II, Robert M. McCutcheon, Kenneth R. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wurman v. Walker et al
as 1:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
Richard Saul Wurman
Defendant:
Jay S. Walker and TEDMED, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. A.T. Wall, et al
as 1:2010cv00178
Plaintiff:
Dennard Walker
Defendant:
A.T. Wall, Lt. Galligan, Michele Auger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00624
Plaintiff:
Kathy M. Walker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00613
Plaintiff:
Anita L. Walker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
