Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00731
Defendant:
Trudy Gilmond, David Kettner, David Sorrells and others
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Wally John Sweeterman III v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv10004
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Wally John Sweeterman III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wally Kabbara v. Design Solutions & Integration, Inc., et al
as 8:2020cv01207
Plaintiff:
Wally Kabbara
Defendant:
Does 1 through 25, inclusive and Design Solutions & Integration, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doug Kisaka v. University of Southern et al
as 2:2020cv03680
Defendant:
C. Jimenez, Carey Drayton, Jody Shipper and others
Plaintiff:
Doug Kisaka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(PC) Merriman v. Telander et al
as 2:2018cv02800
Defendant:
Coffin, Courtney Jerusik, James Telander and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Merriman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric C. Chatman v. Nissan Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv01441
Defendant:
Pacific Western Bank, City of San Clemente, Carls Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
in re Application of Wallis et al
as 4:2018mc80147
Defendant:
Application of Wallis et al
In Re:
Charles Stancer, Tom Pires, Raymond Stancer and others
Chatman v. Nissan Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv04441
Defendant:
Pacific Western Bank, City of San Clemente, Fleetwood, Winnebago, Boundry and others
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
