Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Mosley v. Warden Janson
as 2:2023cv02647
Petitioner:
Jacob Mosley
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Patterson v. Warden Janson, FCI Edgefield
as 2:2023cv02930
Petitioner:
Alandis D Patterson
Respondent:
Warden Janson, FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Santome v. Janson
as 2:2023cv02174
Petitioner:
Andres Aaron Mentiel Santome
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Robinson v. Warden Janson
as 9:2023cv03347
Petitioner:
Carlos D. Robinson
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ventura Garcia v. Warden Janson
as 23-6539
Petitioner / Appellant:
VENTURA GARCIA, a/k/a Ventura Garcia Olvera
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN JANSON
Rodriguez v. Janson FCI Edgefield
as 1:2023cv01893
Petitioner:
Daniel Angel Rodriguez and Daniel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Janson FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reason v. Janson
as 4:2023cv01894
Petitioner:
Julius Andrew Reason, III
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Caviedes-Zuniga v. Warden Janson
as 0:2023cv02008
Petitioner:
Mario Caviedes-Zuniga and Mario Alejandro Caviedes-Zuniga
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mixson v. Warden Janson
as 2:2023cv01618
Petitioner:
Rondall Clyde Mixson
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
