Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Kingdawud Burgess v. Warden Atkinson
as 13-7800
Petitioner - Appellant:
KINGDAWUD MUJAHID BURGESS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN ATKINSON, FCI Edgefield
Vance v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv02753
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Vance
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BETHEA v. LEVI et al
as 2:2011cv00631
Petitioner:
James E Bethea
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Edgefield, Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ivy v. USA
as 2:2010cv03245
Petitioner:
James Edward Ivy
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Van Hoorelbeke v. United States of America et al
as 0:2010cv00659
Petitioner:
Gerard J Van Hoorelbeke
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cobb v. Warden of FCI Edgefield
as 3:2010cv00168
Petitioner:
Terry L Cobb
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller v. United States of America et al
as 6:2009cv03162
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Miller
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Leroy Killian v. US
as 09-7838
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEROY KILLIAN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN, of FCI Edgefield
David Hicks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 09-7205
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID HICKS
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden of FCI Edgefield in his official capacity
Miller v. United States of America et al
as 6:2009cv01150
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Miller
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
