Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 21 - 30 of 913
ORELLANA-VALLADAR v. TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2023cv22869
Plaintiff: WILLIAM ORELLANA-VALLADAR
Cross Claimant: MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP
Cross Defendant: ROBERT M. DOLAN, JR., ADAM GUKER, RICHARD CONKLIN and others
Defendant: JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS et al v. OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP
as 2:2023cv22619
Petitioner: AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC., J. MICHAEL ADAMS, AMY BRADLEY and others
Respondent: OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP
Intervenor: JULIUS D. RUDOLPH, DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P., IZZY and others
MCGILLVARY v. SCUTARI et al
as 1:2023cv22605
Plaintiff: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant: NICHOLAS SCUTARI, NETFLIX, THEODORE ROMANKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GS LINE, INC. v. LG ELECTRONICS, USA, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv21528
Counter Defendant: GS LINE, INC.
3Rd Party Plaintiff: LG ELECTRONICS, USA, INC. and LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM USA, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant: DEBORAH HULL ROSSI, HURLEY MARKETING GROUP, BRIAN NORMANN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
THOMAS v. U-HAUL COMPANY et al
as 1:2023cv21469
Plaintiff: CARL THOMAS
Defendant: U-HAUL COMPANY, U-HAUL OF MOUNT LAUREL, U-HAUL OF NEW JERSEY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION et al v. SMITH, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv08761
Plaintiff: ROCHE DIABETES CARE, INC. and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Cross Defendant: MERCATO MANAGEMENT, LLC, MERCATO PARTNERS AI II, L.P., KESMAN HUGHES & COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant: SAHILY PAOLINE, MERCATO PARTNERS GROWTH II, L.P., MERCATO PARTNERS INGRAM CO-INVEST, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: JEFFREY C. SMITH
3Rd Party Plaintiff: ZIONS BANCORPORATION, N.A.
Special Master: THE HONORABLE DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH
Interested Party: Bradley W. Howard and Jeffrey S. Baird
3Rd Party Defendant: EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY D/B/A EXPRESS SCRIPTS, CVS CAREMARK, XYZ Corporation Pharmacy Benefit Managers 1-99 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
KAARI et al v. OCEAN COUNTY et al
as 3:2023cv20670
Plaintiff: MR. ZACHARY KYLE KAARI and MR. NATHAN GLEN IVERSON
Defendant: OCEAN COUNTY, OCEAN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, BRADLEY BILLHIMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. et al
as 3:2023cv21344
Defendant: PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC), JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. doing business as LUZENAC AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: SANDRA ADAMS
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LIFESCAN, INC. et al v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv05552
Cross Defendant: SAHILY PAOLINE, STEVEN L. HADLOCK, MERCATO PARTNERS AI II, L.P. and others
Cross Claimant: JEFFREY C. SMITH
Plaintiff: LIFESCAN, INC.
Interested Party: JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC., Bradley W. Howard and Jeffrey S. Baird
Defendant: GEOFFREY S. SWINDLE, MERCATO MANAGEMENT, LLC, ADAM KOOPERSMITH and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: ZB, N.A.
Special Master: THE HONORABLE DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH
3Rd Party Defendant: XYZ Corporation Pharmacy Benefit Manger 1-99, PRIME THERAPEUTICS LLC, XYZ Corporation Distributors 1-99 and others
Petitioner: KPMG LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
ADAMS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv19738
Plaintiff: VERONICA ADAMS
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?