Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Guerrero v. Top Guard Professionals, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv22474
Plaintiff:
Jossue Guerrero
Defendant:
Top Guard Professionals, Inc., Yolanda Garcia and Orlando Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
The Estate of Javier Garcia Gaona, Jr. et al v. City of Santa Maria et al
as 2:2017cv01983
Defendant:
Gabriel Alvarez, Does, Matt Holton and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Garcia Gaona, Yolanda Garcia and The Estate of Javier Garcia Gaona, Jr.
Clemencia Garcia-Morales v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-4121
Petitioner:
CLEMENCIA YOLANDA GARCIA-MORALES
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General
Aranguren v. Top Guard Professionals, Inc et al
as 1:2016cv22357
Defendant:
Top Guard Professionals, Inc, Yolanda Garcia and Antonio Ruiz Rodriguez, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Amaury Castro Aranguren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. v. Varela-Rico et al
as 3:2016cv01997
Plaintiff:
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose Luis Varela-Rico, Yolanda Garcia-Blanco and Conjugal Partnership Varela-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00830
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Garcia
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Garcia v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 3:2013cv51358
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Garcia
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as ILS/3:13-cv-51358
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Garcia
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Joe Braun et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Haitham Bibi, Joe Braun, Jolene Coffman and others
Defendant:
Does, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
