Cases 21 - 30 of 46
MISO Transmission Owners v. FERC
as 20-1182
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, and Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, a subsidiary of Xcel Energy Inc. and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Trade Commission v. Peabody Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Arch Coal, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and OGE Energy Corp.
Intervenor:
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Southwestern Electric Power Company and others
Interested Party:
Morrison & Foerster LLP, Alliant Energy, Caterpillar Inc. and others
Petitioner:
NRG Energy, Inc., The Southern Company, DTE Energy Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Texas Municipal Power Agency and Western Coal Traffic League
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
United States, et al v. Ameren Missouri
as 19-3220
Defendant / Appellant:
Ameren Missouri
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Intervenor / Appellee:
Sierra Club
Coburn v. Saul et al
as 4:2019cv02705
Plaintiff:
Madeline Michelle Coburn
Defendant:
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, Ameren Missouri, Carvana Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A AMEREN MISSOURI et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv02940
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A AMEREN MISSOURI, AMEREN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
USA v. Ameren Missouri et al
as 3:2019cv00231
Defendant:
Afton Chemical Corporation, Solutia Inc., Pharmacia LLP and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Peterson v. Madson et al
as 2:2017cv04058
Plaintiff:
Peterson, Marshall Lawrence Peterson and Union Electric Company doing business as AmerenUE doing business as Ameren Missouri
Defendant:
Madson, William Madson, Donna Madson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MISO Transmission Owners v. FERC
as 16-1449
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, Ameren Services Company, agent of Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company, d/b/a Ameren Illinois, d/b/a Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
Ameren Services Company, et al v. FERC
as 16-1373
Petitioner:
Ameren Services Company, Ameren Illinois Company, Union Electric Company, doing business as Ameren Missouri and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MISO Transmission Owners, et al v. FERC
as 16-1325
Petitioner:
MISO Transmission Owners, ALLETE, Inc., for its operating division Minnesota Power (and its subsidiary Superior Water, L&P), Ameren Services Company, as agent for Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, and Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Organization of MISO States, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
