Cases 21 - 30 of 14,003
Melocchi v. PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01132
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC., PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC, CVS HEALTH and others
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Melocchi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Williams v. NOVO HOLDINGS A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03572
Plaintiff:
Ursula F Williams
Defendant:
NOVO HOLDINGS A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PARKER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03440
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA F PARKER
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
J.B.C v. Athens Area School District et al
as 4:2024cv01249
Defendant:
Craig J. Stage, ED.D, Christopher Mitchell, William Clark and others
Plaintiff:
J.B.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Cooper et al
as 2:2024cv03250
Defendant:
Reginald E Davis, LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION, PATRICK S. PITTARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Wiersum v. Cooper et al
as 2:2024cv03251
Defendant:
M. LEANNE LACHMAN, Dale Lefebvre, DENNIS R. GLASS and others
Plaintiff:
Robert R Wiersum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
JONES (BONNER) v. CITY OF MCKEESPORT et al
as 2:2024cv01050
Defendant:
KIRK WILLIAMS, EUGENE F. RIAZZI, CITY OF PITTBURGH and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZMIN CHAVAE JONES (BONNER)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Borkowski v. THE HANOVER AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03113
Defendant:
THE HANOVER AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Edward F. Borkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rowe v. Big Lots et al
as 1:2024cv01162
Defendant:
Big Lots and Big Lots Stores, LLC
Plaintiff:
Melody F. Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
