Cases 21 - 30 of 5,868
Labrooy v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Labrooy
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc. and Metro Knoxville HMA, LLC doing business as North Knoxville Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Su v. Tosh Pork, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Tosh Pork, LLC and Dianna Rosa
Sharp v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sharp
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc. and Campbell County HMA, LLC doing business as Lafollette Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore et al v. StonePeak Ceramics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Moore and Jessie Woolverton
Defendant:
StonePeak Ceramics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
Ferriss v. HomeServe USA Corp.
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Kristie Ferriss
Defendant:
HomeServe USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Powell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Powell
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Manning v. University Health System, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00164
Defendant:
University Health System, Inc. and The University of Tennessee Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Greg Manning
Carlyle v. Stryker Employment Company, LLC
as 2:2024cv02226
Plaintiff:
John Carlyle
Defendant:
Stryker Employment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Nelson et al v. Tranco Logistics, LLC
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Thomas Nelson and Jaimie Nelson
Defendant:
Tranco Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
