Cases 21 - 30 of 8,751
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Quintin Frazier
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail and T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Heath Taylor and Steve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Givens et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Julian Brett Watson
Defendant:
Adrienne Givens and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackmon v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jareece Edward Blackmon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Guthrie v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Guthrie
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeton v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. McClain et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
James Leslie Bailey
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Randolph County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sexton v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sexton
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
