Cases 21 - 30 of 4,256
Krieg v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Eric Krieg
Respondent:
Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bennett v. Commonwealth Kentucky
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Cecil Bennett
Defendant:
Commonwealth Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Krieg v. Warden of USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Eric Krieg
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
William Hernandez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Hughes
as 2:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Michael Ernest Moore
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrett v. Plappert
as 3:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Jerard Garrett
Respondent:
Laura Plappert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Troy Gardner
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coffman v. Roby
as 3:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
